Comments on: Firefox 3 vs. Opera 9 re: memory usage

By: Firefox ile ilgili yanıldıklarımız | Rapid-Download

Firefox ile ilgili yanıldıklarımız | Rapid-Download — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:30:30 +0000

[...] Says It All (TechCrunch) - Firefox 3 Beta 1 Review – Memory Usage Is Worse! (Lockergnome) - Firefox 3 vs. Opera 9 re: memory usage (nonzero) İlgili yazılar:Lost 6. sezon havaalanı setinden görüntüler LA XMozilla FirefoxLost [...]

By: Aakash

Aakash — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:36:34 +0000

I agree. Firefox is a serious memory hogger and always tops my list of memory intensive programs, even right now…its’ taking up close to 130mb.

By: Firefox Mitleri - 2 | Z@H3K OPERA BLOG™

Firefox Mitleri - 2 | Z@H3K OPERA BLOG™ — Sun, 10 May 2009 20:09:21 +0000

[...] Use Says It All (TechCrunch) - Firefox 3 Beta 1 Review – Memory Usage Is Worse! (Lockergnome) - Firefox 3 vs. Opera 9 re: memory usage (nonzero) Greased Lightbox [...]

By: Grease

Grease — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:31:41 +0000

Opera 7.6 had serious memory problems, but they fixed it since then. Maybe we have to wait until Firefox 5. And also Opera is doing so many things that Firefox isn’t, such as user javascript, going through server manager, etc.

By: » I falsi miti di Firefox Sciambola!

» I falsi miti di Firefox Sciambola! — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:44:08 +0000

[...] Use Says It All (TechCrunch) – Firefox 3 Beta 1 Review – Memory Usage Is Worse! (Lockergnome) – Firefox 3 vs. Opera 9 re: memory usage [...]

By: unknown

unknown — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:40:01 +0000

this isn’t right ok i use both of opera n firefox on vista ultimate and for me opera is better and faster but it uses more memory usage but still ok

By: kelbelle

kelbelle — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:10:35 +0000

opera is my jam

By: jon

jon — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:57:25 +0000

dragonfly.opera.com …